<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Opine Consulting &#187; iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opineconsulting.com/tag/iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opineconsulting.com</link>
	<description>Advises corporate and government clients globally on strategic marketing, innovation and service management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Design for experience, not features</title>
		<link>http://www.opineconsulting.com/design-for-experience-not-features/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opineconsulting.com/design-for-experience-not-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New product development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conjoint analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opine.bbbtestsite.co.uk/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The iPhone is one of the least usable phones for sending text and email but gets the highest consumer satisfaction of any smartphone. Why?  It’s designed around experience not features.

<br><p style="margin-top:10px;">Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-time-product-launches/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to time product launches perfectly'>How to time product launches perfectly</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-to-have-disruptive-ideas/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to have disruptive ideas'>How to have disruptive ideas</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How service teams can inspire product innovation'>How service teams can inspire product innovation</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_296" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.opineconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Phone-Frustration-XSmall.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-296 " style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="Phone Frustration XSmall" src="http://www.opineconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Phone-Frustration-XSmall-150x150.jpg" alt="The problem with product development" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The problem with product development</p></div>
<p>The iPhone is one of the least usable phones for sending text and email but gets the highest consumer satisfaction of any smartphone. Why?  It&#8217;s <strong>product design</strong> that&#8217;s based around experience not features.</p>
<h2>Small usability, big love</h2>
<p>An average iPhone user makes almost three times more errors per text message than someone using a hard-key QWERTY phone (see <a class="alignright" title="iPhone usability research" href="http://www.usercentric.com/news/2007/11/13/direct-comparison-iphone-and-hard-key-qwerty-phone-owners-indicates-higher-text-entr" target="_blank"><br />
</a><a title="iPhone usability research" href="http://www.usercentric.com/news/2007/11/13/direct-comparison-iphone-and-hard-key-qwerty-phone-owners-indicates-higher-text-entr" target="_blank">usercentric</a>.com).  But googling the terms “iPhone love” gets about 336 million results and the iPhone has higher customer satisfaction than any other smartphone (see JDPower consumer research, <a title="Smartphone customer satisfaction research" href="http://businesscenter.jdpower.com/news/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009224" target="_blank">here</a> <a class="alignright" title="Smartphone customer satisfaction research" href="http://businesscenter.jdpower.com/news/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009224" target="_blank"><br />
</a>).</p>
<h2>Experience not features</h2>
<p>It&#8217;s not just less usable.  If anything, the iPhone has less features than many competitors.  Mobile email, voicemail and mobile web browsing are hardly new, you can’t forward a text or voicemail and the camera is positively primitive.</p>
<p>But it does have Apple’s trademark obsession about experience.  This isn’t just in the fluidity of the interface or the resolved simplicity of the case.  If you buy one in an Apple store it will be “served” to you with a flourish like Michelin-starred food.</p>
<p><strong>Product developers</strong> spend lots of time benchmarking product features and prioritising them using techniques like conjoint analysis.  What we need to do more of is design, customer ethnography and journey mapping to build experiences out of our products.</p>


<br><p style="margin-top:10px;">Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-time-product-launches/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to time product launches perfectly'>How to time product launches perfectly</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-to-have-disruptive-ideas/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to have disruptive ideas'>How to have disruptive ideas</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How service teams can inspire product innovation'>How service teams can inspire product innovation</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opineconsulting.com/design-for-experience-not-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to time product launches perfectly</title>
		<link>http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-time-product-launches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-time-product-launches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New product development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change curve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premature genius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opine.bbbtestsite.co.uk/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Premature genius is one of the most overlooked challenges of product development.  To visualise the problem, think of a change curve.  Launch too early and no amount of marketing and development spend will get you to take off.  Launch too late and you may not catch up with competitors.

<br><p style="margin-top:10px;">Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/design-for-experience-not-features/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Design for experience, not features'>Design for experience, not features</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How service teams can inspire product innovation'>How service teams can inspire product innovation</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/7-innovation-questions/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential'>After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a contrasting tale of two Apple products that struck me recently.  Wired Magazine carried a story about Apple’s 1983 design for an &#8216;iTablet&#8217; <a title="Apple's 1983 iTablet design" href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/apple-tablet-1983" target="_blank">here</a>. Twenty-seven years later and the iPad is finally launched.  In 1989, Apple did start developing the Apple Newton, an early personal digital assistant.  Despite brilliant, breakthrough functionality, the Newton was canned in 1998, following a prolonged commercial flop.</p>
<h2>Premature genius and the art of timing</h2>
<div id="attachment_115" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 280px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-115 " title="The change curve in product development" src="http://opine.bbbtestsite.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/change-curve-graphic-300x225.jpg" alt="The change curve in product development" width="270" height="203" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The change curve in product development</p></div>
<p style="margin: 20px 0 30px 0;">Premature genius is one of the most overlooked challenges of <strong>product development</strong>.  To visualise the problem, think of a change curve.  Launch too early and no amount of marketing and development spend will get you to take off.  Launch too late and you may not catch up with competitors.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an important nuance in the story about the Apple Newton.  It may have seemed like a failure.  But, an ex-Apple staffer tells me that there’s a direct line of sight between the technical and human lessons which Apple learned on the Newton and the huge success of iPod and iPhone.  No Newton, no iPod, no iPhone.</p>
<h2>Three key disciplines for perfect launch timing</h2>
<p><strong>New product development </strong>needs to be framed in the present and future.  There are three key disciplines for achieving that:</p>
<ol>
<li>Trend analysis.  Create private foresight out of public knowledge by identifying precisely what trends affect your product idea and understanding exactly where you are on the change curve.</li>
<li>Invest in corporate memory of rejected ideas and failed products.  Put in place structured PRINCE2 style lessons learned documentation.  Put old concepts on ice and review them regularly.</li>
<li>Identify the modular“components” of innovation be it an insight into customer needs, a process or technology.  An entire concept may not have worked, but many of its building blocks could be entirely sound.</li>
</ol>


<br><p style="margin-top:10px;">Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/design-for-experience-not-features/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Design for experience, not features'>Design for experience, not features</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How service teams can inspire product innovation'>How service teams can inspire product innovation</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/7-innovation-questions/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential'>After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-time-product-launches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
