<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Opine Consulting &#187; usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opineconsulting.com/tag/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opineconsulting.com</link>
	<description>Advises corporate and government clients globally on strategic marketing, innovation and service management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>How service teams can inspire product innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New product development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer ethnography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychodemographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opineconsulting.com/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investing in customer insight but cutting customer contact makes no sense.  Service teams have huge emotional investment in putting right the things that cause customers angst.  They should be central to strategic product and service innovation.

<br><p style="margin-top:10px;">Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/five-types-service-failure/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Five ways that customer service fails&#8230; and what to do about it'>Five ways that customer service fails&#8230; and what to do about it</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-to-have-disruptive-ideas/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to have disruptive ideas'>How to have disruptive ideas</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/7-innovation-questions/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential'>After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Investing in customer insight but cutting customer contact makes no sense.  Service teams have huge emotional investment in putting right the things that cause customers angst.  They should be central to strategic product and service innovation.</em></p>
<h2>Customer insight arms race</h2>
<p>For £10,000 a report, anybody can buy as much customer surveying, benchmarking, customer ethnography, usability, psychodemographic segmentation, social network monitoring and integrated listening capability as they want.  There are two problems with driving innovation from this kind of insight:</p>
<ol>
<li>Lots of organisations have deep pockets, so the pursuit of a commercial edge through third party solutions becomes an arms race rather than a competitive advantage.</li>
<li>These approaches are a step removed from reality.  They’re constructs.   They are to real customer experience what television is to reality or what air conditioning is to climate.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Contact centre Cassandras</h2>
<p>By contrast, service teams are the most under-exploited resource for driving product and service innovation out of customer insight.  If this isn’t self-evident, ask yourself the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Who spends the day in constant contact with customers?</li>
<li>Who has most emotional investment in putting right the things that cause customers angst?</li>
</ul>
<p>Contact centre staff know exactly what customers love and hate.  They experience it viscerally every day.  But, Cassandra-like, their voice is often overlooked in strategic marketing and new product innovation.  Why?  The reasons boil down to a)  narrow service management focus on cost and operations, b) silo’s between service management and marketing c) service staff without the skills, systems or incentives to make a strategic difference and d) physical and cultural remoteness from the Board.  Visually, the problem looks like this:</p>
<div id="attachment_351" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-351 " title="Driving product innovation and service innovation from the service team." src="http://www.opineconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Barriers-to-service-innovation-300x225.jpg" alt="Driving product innovation and service innovation from the service team." width="600" height="450" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Service management barriers to product innovation</p></div>
<h2><strong>The most powerful customer insight you&#8217;ll ever have?</strong></h2>
<p>All of these barriers can be broken down fairly easily, and for far less cost than many customer insight approaches.  Here are four key ways of doing it:</p>
<ol>
<li>Get service agents to listen and probe for what customers are saying about competitors, products and features.  Make sure that this kind of insight can be captured and reported in the Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system.</li>
<li>Track service performance against brand values, and not just operational targets.</li>
<li>Conduct regular reviews of raw customer service feedback, searching for strategic product and service insight.</li>
<li>Give the Board regular, visceral, experience of the customer.  Board members should sit in on the call centre at least every month and should regularly listen to representative recordings of customer contact.</li>
</ol>


<br><p style="margin-top:10px;">Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/five-types-service-failure/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Five ways that customer service fails&#8230; and what to do about it'>Five ways that customer service fails&#8230; and what to do about it</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-to-have-disruptive-ideas/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to have disruptive ideas'>How to have disruptive ideas</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/7-innovation-questions/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential'>After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design for experience, not features</title>
		<link>http://www.opineconsulting.com/design-for-experience-not-features/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opineconsulting.com/design-for-experience-not-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New product development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conjoint analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opine.bbbtestsite.co.uk/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The iPhone is one of the least usable phones for sending text and email but gets the highest consumer satisfaction of any smartphone. Why?  It’s designed around experience not features.

<br><p style="margin-top:10px;">Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-time-product-launches/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to time product launches perfectly'>How to time product launches perfectly</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-to-have-disruptive-ideas/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to have disruptive ideas'>How to have disruptive ideas</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How service teams can inspire product innovation'>How service teams can inspire product innovation</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_296" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.opineconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Phone-Frustration-XSmall.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-296 " style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="Phone Frustration XSmall" src="http://www.opineconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Phone-Frustration-XSmall-150x150.jpg" alt="The problem with product development" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The problem with product development</p></div>
<p>The iPhone is one of the least usable phones for sending text and email but gets the highest consumer satisfaction of any smartphone. Why?  It&#8217;s <strong>product design</strong> that&#8217;s based around experience not features.</p>
<h2>Small usability, big love</h2>
<p>An average iPhone user makes almost three times more errors per text message than someone using a hard-key QWERTY phone (see <a class="alignright" title="iPhone usability research" href="http://www.usercentric.com/news/2007/11/13/direct-comparison-iphone-and-hard-key-qwerty-phone-owners-indicates-higher-text-entr" target="_blank"><br />
</a><a title="iPhone usability research" href="http://www.usercentric.com/news/2007/11/13/direct-comparison-iphone-and-hard-key-qwerty-phone-owners-indicates-higher-text-entr" target="_blank">usercentric</a>.com).  But googling the terms “iPhone love” gets about 336 million results and the iPhone has higher customer satisfaction than any other smartphone (see JDPower consumer research, <a title="Smartphone customer satisfaction research" href="http://businesscenter.jdpower.com/news/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009224" target="_blank">here</a> <a class="alignright" title="Smartphone customer satisfaction research" href="http://businesscenter.jdpower.com/news/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009224" target="_blank"><br />
</a>).</p>
<h2>Experience not features</h2>
<p>It&#8217;s not just less usable.  If anything, the iPhone has less features than many competitors.  Mobile email, voicemail and mobile web browsing are hardly new, you can’t forward a text or voicemail and the camera is positively primitive.</p>
<p>But it does have Apple’s trademark obsession about experience.  This isn’t just in the fluidity of the interface or the resolved simplicity of the case.  If you buy one in an Apple store it will be “served” to you with a flourish like Michelin-starred food.</p>
<p><strong>Product developers</strong> spend lots of time benchmarking product features and prioritising them using techniques like conjoint analysis.  What we need to do more of is design, customer ethnography and journey mapping to build experiences out of our products.</p>


<br><p style="margin-top:10px;">Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-time-product-launches/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to time product launches perfectly'>How to time product launches perfectly</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-to-have-disruptive-ideas/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to have disruptive ideas'>How to have disruptive ideas</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How service teams can inspire product innovation'>How service teams can inspire product innovation</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opineconsulting.com/design-for-experience-not-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

