<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Opine Consulting &#187; Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opineconsulting.com/tag/yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opineconsulting.com</link>
	<description>Advises corporate and government clients globally on strategic marketing, innovation and service management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>The Attention Arms Race</title>
		<link>http://www.opineconsulting.com/the-attention-arms-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opineconsulting.com/the-attention-arms-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opineconsulting.com/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we measured customer attention like Gross Domestic Product, we’d know we were in trouble.  Advertising, promotion and information are locked in an inflationary spiral as too much data chases too few eyeballs.  Per capita, ‘Gross Domestic Attention’ (let’s call it GDA) is falling off a cliff.   Thinking about the SEO arms race, is making me get very clear that imagination is worth more than cash.

<br><p style="margin-top:10px;">Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How service teams can inspire product innovation'>How service teams can inspire product innovation</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/customer-brand-engagement/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Old-school hip-hop and a pretty strange lesson in customer engagement'>Old-school hip-hop and a pretty strange lesson in customer engagement</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/7-innovation-questions/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential'>After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-379" style="margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px;" title="Information overload" src="http://www.opineconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Information-overload.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="282" />If we measured customer attention like Gross Domestic Product, we’d know we were in trouble.  Advertising, promotion and information are locked in an inflationary spiral as too much data chases too few eyeballs.  Per capita, ‘Gross Domestic Attention’ (let’s call it GDA) is falling off a cliff.</p>
<h2>The SEO money pit</h2>
<p>Here’s a personal example.  Yesterday, I paid $299 dollars to Yahoo for a little, insignificant Directory listing for Opine Consulting (which is <a title="Yahoo Directory Opine Consulting Entry" href="http://dir.yahoo.com/Regional/Countries/United_Kingdom/Business_and_Econ omy/Business_to_Business/Marketing_and_Advertising/Consulting/" target="_blank">here</a>, in case you’re curious).</p>
<p>Submitting to the big directories is part of basic belt and braces Search Engine Optimisation (SEO).  However, $299 is a lot of money for an obscure little raindrop of a link in the big, wide ocean of the internet.  For the keyword “innovation” my site is competing against 112 million other pages on Google.  For ‘marketing’, I’m up against half-a-billion alternatives.  For ‘service’ there are just a shade under 10 billion pages.</p>
<p>SEO is at the sharp-end of the global attention famine.  In the SEO arms race, only the biggest juggernauts (and of course the channel owners) can be long-run winners.    The internet is moving towards a globally perfect market and back-links, directory submissions, paid search, and article marketing are money-pits.</p>
<h2>Innovation is worth more than cash</h2>
<p>Thinking about the SEO arms race, is making me get very clear about these principles:</p>
<ol>
<li> Imagination is worth more than cash.  A resonant idea that people pick up on, creates more exposure than £££s of traditional marketing expenditure.</li>
<li>Innovation has no monopolies.  If anything, it’s inverse to size as many large organisations are bound by conservatism and process.  That’s an incendiary thought because of what it means for competition.</li>
<li>Innovation can’t be faked.  It comes out of fun, interest and obsession.  Like any right-brain process it’s unpredictable and isn’t confined to 9-5 thinking.  People doing what they love will win in this particular game.</li>
</ol>
<p>I can guarantee that I won&#8217;t be spending much more on SEO.  Watch this space&#8230;</p>


<br><p style="margin-top:10px;">Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/how-service-teams-can-inspire-product-innovation/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How service teams can inspire product innovation'>How service teams can inspire product innovation</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/customer-brand-engagement/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Old-school hip-hop and a pretty strange lesson in customer engagement'>Old-school hip-hop and a pretty strange lesson in customer engagement</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.opineconsulting.com/7-innovation-questions/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential'>After Eureka: 7 questions to test innovation for big and unreasonable profit potential</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opineconsulting.com/the-attention-arms-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

